Skip to main content
Codeview Digital
Technology Advisory Retainer

Platform Selection Advisory

Crown Corporation, National Energy Regulator

Platform Selection Advisory

Overview

A national energy regulator Crown corporation engaged Codeview Digital on an Engaged-tier Technology Advisory Retainer to provide independent guidance through a critical enterprise service management platform selection. The organization's existing ITSM platform was approaching end-of-life, and leadership needed experienced, vendor-neutral advisory to work through a high-stakes decision that would shape their IT operations for the next decade.

The Challenge

The Crown corporation faced a complex platform selection decision with significant financial and operational risk, compounded by internal dynamics and procurement constraints:

  • Existing ITSM platform reaching end-of-life with 18 months of vendor support remaining, creating urgency without room for a misstep
  • Previous platform selection 8 years prior had been vendor-led, resulting in a solution that never achieved more than 40% of planned functionality and required extensive customization
  • 5 shortlisted vendors each presenting compelling but conflicting narratives, with no internal expertise to objectively evaluate claims against the organization's actual requirements
  • IT leadership split between two preferred vendors based on prior personal experience rather than structured evaluation criteria
  • Government procurement requirements mandating formal evaluation frameworks, weighted scoring, and documented justification, but no internal capacity to design these properly
  • Integration requirements with 4 existing enterprise systems (ERP, GIS, document management, and regulatory case management) poorly understood and not documented

The Solution

Requirements Discovery

Conducted structured requirements workshops with 6 business units and IT operations to document 142 functional and technical requirements, weighted by business criticality. This replaced assumptions with evidence-based evaluation criteria.

Evaluation Framework Design

Designed a vendor evaluation framework with weighted scoring across 8 categories: functional fit, integration capability, total cost of ownership, vendor viability, implementation risk, and Canadian data residency compliance, among others.

Vendor Demonstration Program

Structured and facilitated a standardized vendor demonstration program where all 5 vendors addressed identical scenario-based use cases, enabling apples-to-apples comparison and eliminating presentation bias.

Integration Assessment

Documented integration requirements and assessed each vendor's native capabilities and API maturity against the 4 existing enterprise systems, identifying one vendor's critical integration gap that would have required $600K in custom middleware development.

Total Cost of Ownership Analysis

Developed a 7-year total cost of ownership model for each vendor including licensing, implementation, integration, training, ongoing support, and upgrade costs. This revealed a $1.2M variance between the most and least expensive options.

Decision Package & Recommendation

Delivered a complete decision package with scored evaluation results, risk assessment, TCO comparison, and a clear recommendation with documented justification meeting all government procurement documentation requirements.

Tech Stack

ServiceNowBMC HelixJira Service ManagementIvantiFreshserviceVendor Evaluation FrameworksTCO Modeling

Project Details

Timeline

4 months (June to September 2025, Engaged tier)

Market Value

$10,000/month

Results

  • Identified critical integration gap in leading candidate that would have cost $600K in custom middleware. Avoided through structured evaluation
  • 7-year TCO analysis revealed $1.2M variance between vendors, enabling informed budget planning
  • Resolved internal leadership disagreement through evidence-based scoring, achieving unanimous vendor selection
  • Procurement documentation met all government evaluation and justification requirements on first submission
  • Selected platform achieved 89% functional fit score, more than double the 40% achieved in previous platform selection

Ready to talk?

We don't do high-pressure sales. Just a straightforward conversation about your challenges and whether we can help.

Start a Conversation